In “Poetry as Memorable Speech” Auden expresses that poetry
should be memorable. He believes that poetry needs to evoke emotion in the
reader. In regards to poetry Auden says, “…it must move our emotions, or excite
our intellect, for only that which is moving or exciting is memorable, and the
stimulus is the incantation we must surrender, as we do when talking to an
intimate friend.” He believes that an important part of poetry is expressing
emotion in writing. When someone is talking to a close friend they use a lot of
feeling in the way they phrase what they say. Auden thinks that poets should take
a similar mindset when writing poetry. Auden also believes poetry does not need
to be about important things in life. He explains this when he says, “The test
of a poet is the frequency and diversity of the occasions on which we remember
his poetry.” This shows that he believes that poetry can be about anything.
In “An Arundel Tomb” Philip Larkin uses a lot of memorable
speech that increases its level of enjoyment as well as its ambiguity. In the first
line in the third stanza Larkin says, “They would not think to lie so long.”
This line makes the poem more memorable and adds to its ambiguity because of
the word “lie”. It could allude to the fact that the couple did not expect to die
so young, so they weren’t expecting to be lying
in the tomb for as long as they have been. It also hints at a lie because the
tomb demonstrates everlasting love, which was not the memory the couple wanted
to leave behind in death. Another way Larkin uses memorable speech in his poetry
is in the final stanza. He says, “Time has transfigured them into Untruth.” At
the end of the poem we learn that he is referring to love as this untruth. Usually
poetry makes love something positive or negative, but it is never an “untruth”.
This makes the poem more memorable because it’s not something the reader would
expect, so it stands out. Another reason this line is memorable is because,
while he clearly isn’t referring to love as truthful, he isn’t saying it’s a
lie either. By referring to love as not being a completely truthful thing he is
making the reader think about that line more.
In the same stanza Larkin says, “Our almost-instinct almost
true: What will survive us is love.” Like the first line in this stanza this
line refers to love as something that is not entirely true. In addition to
that, this line alludes to human flaws. The word “almost” reminds us that
humanity can never achieve perfection, and that nothing human is lasting. This could
explain why Larkin believes love is “almost true”. Love is something (as far as
we know) that only humans experience, so it makes sense that he would say that
it wouldn’t last forever. On the other hand this shows the beauty the human
spirit contains. Having humanity’s “almost truth” being that love lasts forever
shows the good in people. It shows that we strive for peace and harmony in
life. The emotion of this line depends on the mindset of the reader. If they’re
happy or have a positive outlook on love they would think the line is positive.
However, someone who is unhappy or doesn’t have a positive outlook on love
would think the line is negative. Personally, I think the line is somewhat
hopeful. Larkin has “What will survive us is love” alone on the last line of
the whole poem. It makes me think that Larkin wanted the reader to remember
that. By making that part stand alone he is making it seem that, although love
might not be everlasting, it is still beautiful.
It is also important to note that this poem is about walking
by a tomb. It is not about a dramatic, life-changing event. Larkin has taking a
moment that is completely ordinary and turned it into something that can make
people think.
Ellen,
ReplyDeleteThis post is quite strong.
I like your analysis of "lie" and of the last line.
I think you could have benefited from summarizing the poem a little bit and putting the lines in their contexts. In a few places, you quote and I'm not sure what you're drawing attention to.
Also, instead of moving from Auden to Larkin, could you write about them together, looking at specific lines from Auden and specific lines from Larkin and then suggesting how they might work together to help us come to a better understanding of poetic language?
I think you're right about the mitigated hopefulness of those last lines. They remind me what poetry as an art can do. With lineation, with specific word choice, with an original scenario, Larkin's able to use 10 words to make us question whether love is a natural instinct or just an almost-instinct, whether our love lives beyond us or not.
DW